An average product sales page from the Silk that is original Road now rebuilt; the site sells illegal drugs, weapons, and much more.
Just one month after the FBI seized and shut straight down Silk path the online world site understood as the Amazon.com of drugs, weapons and worse it is straight back. Yup, into the annals of criminal history, this one has to be up there in the chutzpah department; it’s just like the abilities behind the website are totally thumbing their collective noses at U.S. federal authorities.
Are Bitcoins and Silk Path Founders Aligned?
Also more shocking, brand new allegations connect Silk Road’s founder Ross William Ulbricht aka Dread Pirate Roberts until their FBI takedown last month to your still publicly unidentified original creator of Bitcoins, the digital currency exclusively used to pay for illegal products and services on the old and site that is now new.
The allegations came to light after two Israeli researchers one a cryptographer readied a paper that is soon-to-be-published claims that the FBI seizure in fact only got their hands on approximately 22 percent of the $80 million in commissions Ulbricht’s web site had garnered from sales of an estimated $1.2 billion; product sales on everything ranging from assault tools to illegal narcotics of any kind and also for hit men services for hire.
Dorit Ron and Adi Shamir would be the two researchers who have brought these allegations to light, including they on their own have actually only been able to trace one-third of the total commissions the site pulled in.
However the tale gets a lot more fascinating; the two scientists have actually also been searching for a possible connection between Ulbricht and ‘Satoshi Nakamoto’, the shrouded and never-seen creator of the Bitcoin digital currency exclusively used on the unlawful site, mainly because of its relative untraceability, since it is maybe not tied in to virtually any central banking system. Bitcoins’ value is entirely determined by market demand, and lately, that demand happens to be curiously skyrocketing, with one Bitcoin being respected at over $800 and climbing recently. Just What does it all total up to?
Connecting the Dots
The two Israelis have been able to trace some paths back and have made some connections between Silk Road and Bitcoins that are more than simply business usage. They are able to do so because although the marketplace that is actual may present anonymously, the transactions themselves are totally public. The pair created their own graph so they could track statistically how users interacted on the Silk Road site after getting their hands on a complete listing of all the Bitcoin transactions made this year.
The scientists uncovered a single transfer log that followed Bitcoins deposited into an account now known to be Ulbricht’s in doing this extensive research. That deposit stemmed from another account, developed in January 2009, which placed the latter at very early Bitcoin network time; it had all just gone public per year prior. And while the Israelis say they can not definitively prove that that early Bitcoin account was ‘Nakamoto’s’, there is good explanation to trust it very possibly could indicate an ‘investment’ of sorts in the first Silk path site. Does this time up to a dark connection between Silk Road and Bitcoins?
It might. Another compelling bit of data uncovered by the Israelis was a 1,000 Bitcoin transfer made in March of this year. At that time of transfer, that amount would have translated to about $60,000; but with the current insane value surge in the cryptocurrency, it’s now about $847,000 worth.
‘Such a single transfer that is large not represent the normal behavior of a customer whom starts a merchant account on Silk Road to be able to buy some narcotics (such purchasers are expected in order to make an initial deposit of tens or hundreds of dollars, also to top the account off whenever they buy additional merchandise). It could represent either activity that is large-scale Silk path, or some kind of investment or partnership, but this is pure speculation,’ note the researchers.
A lot more damning is that the depositor that is unidentified had some 77,600 Bitcoins apparently obtained through ‘mining’ operations; that amount would now equal about $64 million in U.S. currency.
‘ The path that is short found suggests (but does not prove) the existence of a surprising link between the two mysterious figures of the Bitcoin community, Satoshi Nakamoto and DPR,’ wrote Ron and Shamir. ‘DPR’ means Ulbrict’s Silk Road code name, Dread Pirate Roberts.
In some ways, it turns out that Bitcoins’ perennial claim it exists beyond the arm that is long of law has proved become correct. The scientists say the cryptographic design and veiled movement of the currency causes it to be much more difficult for law enforcement to seize it than, say, a drug dealer’s stash of thousands concealed in a home. The duo also speculate that there could have been a second up to now undiscovered computer belonging towards the Silk Road founder that the FBI have not yet had the opportunity to track down.
Therefore far, the feds, not surprisingly, haven’t any discuss any of it. If we know anything about anything, someone is in a production meeting in Hollywood appropriate now, casting ‘The Long and Winding Silk Road’ for a brand new cable series.
Silk Road 2.0: How Were They Able To Get a Revised Site Up So Immediately After Shut Down?
How could a high-profile, illegal website seized by the Feds be up and operating again a month later? Evidently, where there is a will, there’s a way. A few billion bucks at stake does not harm either.
It took hardly a minute, it seems, for the anonymous previously active Silk Road user to email former top users about the intention to get the site alive once more. A forum called the ‘Vendor Roundtable’ was created, and on it, the framework for recreating the illicit website began.
The forum’s admin even put up a ‘Help Wanted’ ad for the ‘communication specialist’ somebody who would oversee and coordinate the pieces that are various for the rebuilding process. ‘You will be assigned work to perform based on what needs to be done,’ see the real-money-casino.club ad that is cryptic no reference to what sort of money was included, evidently.
And so, last week, voilà! Silk Road 2.0 appeared; the only difference ended up being in its absence, some competitive internet sites had cropped up to fill the void, all run using the secretive Thor server. Like its predecessor, the latest Silk Road is just a cornucopia of illegal goods and solutions, from heroin hitting guys.
‘Silk Road was a thing that had popularity,’ an anonymous and shrouded user told CNNMoney in a TV interview where also his voice was disguised. ‘That made it simple for people to carry on down that path. As long as you’ll persuade the majority of the greatest purchasers and vendors to go over to the brand new platform, it doesn’t matter what it’s called.’
Word in the street is that in this revised variation, information protection will closely be much more guarded and certainly will even be ‘baked’ into codes. The FBI did crack the site that is last so whether or not they are able to do so on Silk Road 2.0, remains to be seen. FBI Special Agent Christopher Tarbel who helped split the site that is initial say that Silk Road in its initial structure was possibly the largest and most sophisticated criminal marketplace on the online world today.
Massachusetts State Gambling Commission Hears Revere Casino Plan
Boston defeated, but Revere approved, a Suffolk Downs casino; now exactly what? (Image: Patrick Whittemore)
In the event that you move a casino more than a town line, is it still the same casino? This is not a complex philosophical question, but rather the problem dealing with Massachusetts state regulators at this time, as well as both supporters and detractors of a casino at the Suffolk Downs racetrack.
Whose Edge Can It Be, Anyhow?
If you have been following the news out of Massachusetts, you understand that East Boston voters soundly rejected a casino during the race track, while neighboring Revere easily approved the exact same proposal. Since then, Suffolk Downs and Revere officials have considered moving the project so that in the place of straddling the city line on the East Boston side it could entirely be located inside of Revere’s city borders, where voters have already approved it. But that seemingly simple concept has generated protests from East Boston officials and voters whom believed they had shot down the casino once and for all.
The Massachusetts Gambling Commission took testimony and information in from all edges week that is late last there was a lot of debate between advocates on both sides. Therefore the decision was unclear sufficient that the commission decided that they can further study all aspects of the votes before proceeding, including the host agreements, the wording of the ballot questions, and the statutory laws that allow for casino gambling within the state.
One of the major players at the meeting, naturally, ended up being Revere Mayor Dan Rizzo. He showed as much as the commission in person to argue that the host agreement finalized by Revere anticipated the possibility that some or every one of the casino’s development could take place in their city.
The key language comes from a passage within the host community contract linked to the potential for expansion of the Suffolk Downs casino. It says that when Suffolk Downs ‘seeks to grow its video gaming establishment on the Revere property,’ the track owners will need to ‘promptly notify the town and the parties shall negotiate in good faith an amendment to this agreement.’
Rizzo and other politicians representing Revere say that this passage provides town an avenue with which to negotiate a new casino agreement entirely on land inside of Revere proper.
But opponents from East Boston say that this is ridiculous. They say that the language shows that Revere was not expecting a casino that is entire be situated on their land, and point to another passage that seems to clearly show that the standing agreements only apply to the East Boston proposal.
‘ As planned, the project would be constructed within the municipal boundaries of the populous town of Boston,’ the Revere host agreement states.
Revere voted in favor of the Suffolk Downs casino, with about 60 percent of voters approving it. While Mayor Rizzo says that an all-Revere casino would have gotten even more votes, Boston officials say that nevertheless does not mean that a vote on the East Boston proposition equates to approval for a Revere-based casino.
‘Voters in East Boston decisively voted ‘No’ to a casino at Suffolk Downs. Because of that, voters in Revere authorized a proposal that is no longer viable,’ a statement from Boston officials declared.
Virtually no Time to Waste
There’s no timetable for when the gambling commission will come back having a decision on the situation, although the choice will probably come before the year-end deadline for submitting casino applications to the state.
Meanwhile, Revere and Suffolk Downs are hoping that a potential deal with the Mohegan Sun could bolster their chances of experiencing their new plan approved. While no announcement that is official been made, Mayor Rizzo has said that he thinks a partnership could be imminent, perhaps happening as early as this week. If it happens, Mohegan Sun will step into a partnership voided by Caesars Entertainment, whenever that company bailed following allegations of third-party associations with A russian mob figure by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.